BRSIX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
BRSIX is managed by Bridgeway. It was launched on Jul 31, 1997. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | -3.39% | 20.09% | 14.92% | 11.46% | -23.43% | -1.93% | 25.50% | 15.34% | -17.23% | 12.29% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.13% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRSIX achieves a -3.39% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BRSIX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.
BRSIX
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 40.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- -3.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
HWSAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRSIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRSIX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
BRSIX
HWSAX
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRSIX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.72 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 1.15 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 0.91 | +1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 3.37 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRSIX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.72 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.42 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.40 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRSIX and HWSAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
BRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than HWSAX's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | 1.06% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 2.12% | 1.32% | 3.46% | 1.30% | 16.12% | 13.71% | 8.25% | 12.77% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.65% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSIX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRSIX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.79% | -72.14% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -16.44% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.66% | -26.98% | -26.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.09% | -53.82% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.53% | -2.78% | -18.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -11.03% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.43% | -0.23% |
Volatility
BRSIX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that BRSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRSIX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 4.15% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | 12.90% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 23.98% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 21.70% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 24.64% | -0.64% |