BROKX vs. LIAGX
BROKX (BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BROKX returned 19.27%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BROKX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BROKX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.91% return.
BROKX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- —
LIAGX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 26.91%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 39.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BROKX BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K | 10.76% | 32.56% | 6.80% | 19.49% | -13.43% | 1.38% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 26.91% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BROKX and LIAGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BROKX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BROKX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
BROKX
LIAGX
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K (BROKX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BROKX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.72 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 10.93 | -2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BROKX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.92 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.44 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BROKX drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BROKX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BROKX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -37.87% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -14.56% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.04% | -17.11% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.68% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -13.22% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.62% | -0.72% |
Volatility
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K (BROKX) is 4.55%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that BROKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BROKX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 8.20% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 17.97% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 20.65% | -5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 18.78% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 18.78% | -2.00% |
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BROKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
BROKX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
BROKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BROKX BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K | 6.47% | 7.16% | 3.59% | 2.75% | 3.42% | 8.57% | 1.76% | 2.72% | 2.56% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BROKX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to BROKX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BROKX dropped -35.06% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BROKX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer