PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BROKX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K (BROKX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BROKX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.91% return.


BROKX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.76%
6M
13.32%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*

LIAGX

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.61%
YTD
26.91%
6M
27.63%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BROKX
BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K
10.76%32.56%6.80%19.49%-13.43%1.38%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
26.91%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BROKX and LIAGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.90

The correlation between BROKX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BROKX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BROKX
BROKX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BROKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BROKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BROKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BROKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BROKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K (BROKX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BROKXLIAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.72

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

10.93

-2.98

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BROKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BROKX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BROKXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.92

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.44

+0.19

Drawdowns

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BROKX drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BROKX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BROKXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-37.87%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-14.56%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-17.11%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.68%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-13.22%

+8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.62%

-0.72%

Volatility

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K (BROKX) is 4.55%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that BROKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BROKXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

8.20%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

17.97%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

20.65%

-5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

18.78%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

18.78%

-2.00%

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BROKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

BROKX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

BROKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BROKX
BlackRock Advantage International Fund Class K
6.47%7.16%3.59%2.75%3.42%8.57%1.76%2.72%2.56%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.30%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BROKX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to BROKX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BROKX dropped -35.06% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BROKX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer