PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRLN vs. BRTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRLN vs. BRTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRLN achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than BRTR's 0.51% return.


BRLN

1D
0.09%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.08%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
10Y*

BRTR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.61%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRLN vs. BRTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.44%5.38%7.49%0.56%
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
0.51%8.11%1.29%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BRLN and BRTR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRLN vs. BRTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BRTR
BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRLN vs. BRTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRLNBRTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.68

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

5.07

+5.44

BRLN vs. BRTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the BRTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRLN and BRTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRLNBRTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.51

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.19

0.89

+1.30

Drawdowns

BRLN vs. BRTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRLN drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum BRTR drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLN and BRTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRLNBRTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-5.07%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-3.26%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.58%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-1.35%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

1.08%

-0.57%

Volatility

BRLN vs. BRTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) is 0.80%, while Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that BRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRLNBRTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

1.27%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

2.77%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

3.68%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

4.69%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

4.69%

-0.96%

BRLN vs. BRTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRLN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BRTR's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRLN vs. BRTR - Dividend Comparison

BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than BRTR's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.35%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
4.72%4.86%5.58%0.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRLN and BRTR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRTR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to BRLN (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRLN dropped -3.85% vs BRTR's -5.07%.

On 1-year performance, BRTR leads with 5.46% vs 5.39% for BRLN. On fees, BRTR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRTR has performed better with a 5.46% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRTR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 4.72% for BRTR.

BRLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while BRTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BRLN and 0.38% for BRTR.

BRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRLN and BRTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer