PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRLN vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRLN vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRLN vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
-0.73%5.38%7.49%3.46%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
-3.06%30.93%17.07%14.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRLN achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BLCR's -3.06% return.


BRLN

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
0.50%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
3.51%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
2.52%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRLN vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRLN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRLN vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRLN vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRLNBLCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.64

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

2.29

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.89

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.78

12.09

-5.32

BRLN vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRLN and BLCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRLNBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.64

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

1.40

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between BRLN and BLCR is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BRLN vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.58%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.28%0.33%0.75%0.13%0.00%

Drawdowns

BRLN vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRLN drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLN and BLCR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRLNBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-21.29%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-12.13%

+8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-7.11%

+6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-2.28%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

2.90%

-2.23%

Volatility

BRLN vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) is 1.44%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that BRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRLNBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

7.06%

-5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

12.45%

-10.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

21.12%

-17.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

17.59%

-13.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.78%

17.59%

-13.81%