BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BRKY.NEO (Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and FLUS.TO (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BRKY.NEO is actively managed, while FLUS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BRKY.NEO returned 13.62%/yr vs 22.24%/yr for FLUS.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKY.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLUS.TO.

Performance

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKY.NEO achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than FLUS.TO's 15.43% return.

BRKY.NEO

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: -2.05%
• YTD: -3.97%
• 1Y: 1.75%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLUS.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 12.31%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 1Y: 23.07%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: 15.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF	-3.97%	9.36%	34.10%	15.48%	2.16%
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	15.43%	10.51%	34.62%	20.97%	-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2022	0.18

The correlation between BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRKY.NEO	FLUS.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Energy	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	10.1%
Industrials	-	9.5%
Real Estate	-	2.7%
Technology	-	37.0%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKY.NEO

BRKY.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 11
BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BRKY.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKY.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKY.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BRKY.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FLUS.TO

FLUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 58
FLUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FLUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FLUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKY.NEO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	1.54	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	2.22	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.31	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	2.35	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	8.15	-7.80

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKY.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the FLUS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum FLUS.TO drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKY.NEO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-28.24%	+10.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	-9.85%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.42%	-18.82%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.01%	-1.57%	-11.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-3.68%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	2.84%	+2.17%

Volatility

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) is 4.06%, while Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that BRKY.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLUS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKY.NEO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	4.56%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.51%	11.48%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	15.02%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.02%	14.98%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	15.95%	+2.07%

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKY.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUS.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKY.NEO vs. FLUS.TO - Dividend Comparison

BRKY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than FLUS.TO's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF	7.70%	5.58%	10.93%	5.41%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	0.57%	0.74%	0.94%	1.24%	1.77%	1.80%	1.67%	1.89%	1.72%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO in my portfolio?

BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRKY.NEO or FLUS.TO?

On fees, FLUS.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKY.NEO or FLUS.TO?

FLUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BRKY.NEO.

What is the main difference between BRKY.NEO and FLUS.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BRKY.NEO and 0.29% for FLUS.TO.