PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRKIX vs. GMAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund (BRKIX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKIX achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 56.75% return.


BRKIX

1D
-1.06%
1M
7.82%
YTD
30.37%
6M
32.41%
1Y
58.74%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.56%

GMAQX

1D
-0.77%
1M
14.67%
YTD
56.75%
6M
62.50%
1Y
90.84%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRKIX
MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund
30.37%33.78%14.06%9.82%-19.03%-2.20%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
56.75%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKIX and GMAQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.82

The correlation between BRKIX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRKIX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKIX
BRKIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BRKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund (BRKIX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRKIXGMAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.92

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

6.72

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.78

25.88

-8.09

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is comparable to the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 4.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKIX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRKIXGMAQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

4.44

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.79

-0.09

Drawdowns

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKIX drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, smaller than the maximum GMAQX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKIX and GMAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRKIXGMAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-41.97%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-13.77%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-19.64%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.77%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-16.73%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.57%

-0.16%

Volatility

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund (BRKIX) is 6.66%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that BRKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRKIXGMAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

12.63%

-5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

18.56%

-4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

20.83%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

17.21%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.21%

-0.17%

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRKIX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

BRKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than GMAQX's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRKIX
MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.90%2.48%2.51%2.75%3.07%3.80%1.60%1.83%5.35%3.19%0.71%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.02%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRKIX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to BRKIX (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKIX dropped -39.28% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.44 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRKIX and GMAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer