BRKD vs. OMAH
BRKD (Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (-100%), while OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. BRKD is passively managed, while OMAH is actively managed. Over the past year, BRKD returned -1.36% vs 16.89% for OMAH. Their -0.51 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BRKD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
BRKD vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKD achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 10.88% return.
BRKD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- -1.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.59%
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 16.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $20.61M | $17.47M | $16.72M |
BRKD vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 5.90% | 1.39% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 10.88% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKD and OMAH is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | -0.51 |
The correlation between BRKD and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.45 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKD vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
BRKD
OMAH
BRKD vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRKD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 5.76 | -5.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 13.81 | -14.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRKD vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKD drawdown since its inception was -17.92%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKD and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.92% | -11.83% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -2.95% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | 0.00% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -1.22% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 1.23% | +3.61% |
Volatility
BRKD vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) is 0.00%, while VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that BRKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.01% | -3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 5.91% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 8.35% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 12.82% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 12.82% | +3.51% |
BRKD vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKD vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
BRKD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than OMAH's 14.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 1.91% | 3.50% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 14.83% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKD and OMAH have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMAH has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to BRKD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKD dropped -17.92% vs OMAH's -11.83%.
On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 16.89% vs -1.36% for BRKD. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BRKD has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 16.89% return vs -1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BRKD.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.83%, compared with 1.91% for BRKD.
BRKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while OMAH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BRKD and 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRKD and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer