BRKD vs. AMDD
BRKD (Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares) and AMDD (Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. BRKD is passively managed, while AMDD is actively managed. Over the past year, BRKD returned 7.98% vs -85.10% for AMDD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BRKD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for AMDD.
Performance
BRKD vs. AMDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKD achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than AMDD's -67.83% return.
BRKD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 7.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDD
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -41.37%
- YTD
- -67.83%
- 6M
- -67.43%
- 1Y
- -85.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKD vs. AMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 5.90% | -3.56% |
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares | -67.83% | -60.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKD and AMDD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | -0.05 |
The correlation between BRKD and AMDD shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKD vs. AMDD — Risk / Return Rank
BRKD
AMDD
BRKD vs. AMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) and Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRKD | AMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.61 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -1.00 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | -1.62 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKD | AMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | -1.31 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -1.21 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
BRKD vs. AMDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKD drawdown since its inception was -17.92%, smaller than the maximum AMDD drawdown of -90.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKD and AMDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKD | AMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.92% | -90.88% | +72.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -85.34% | +76.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -90.88% | +87.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -56.26% | +48.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 52.65% | -47.87% |
Volatility
BRKD vs. AMDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) is 0.00%, while Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) has a volatility of 27.50%. This indicates that BRKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKD | AMDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 27.50% | -27.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 48.96% | -39.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 64.96% | -51.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 65.71% | -48.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 65.71% | -48.45% |
BRKD vs. AMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDD's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKD vs. AMDD - Dividend Comparison
BRKD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than AMDD's 18.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares | 18.24% | 5.51% |
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 2.82% | 3.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKD and AMDD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDD has higher volatility (27.50%) compared to BRKD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKD dropped -17.92% vs AMDD's -90.88%.
On 1-year performance, BRKD leads with 7.98% vs -85.10% for AMDD. On fees, AMDD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, BRKD has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BRKD has performed better with a 7.98% return vs -85.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMDD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BRKD.
AMDD has the higher dividend yield at 18.24%, compared with 2.82% for BRKD.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BRKD and 0.97% for AMDD.
BRKD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRKD and AMDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer