PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRK-B vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRK-B achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BRK-B has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 13.14%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.20% annualized return.


BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%

FCNTX

1D
-2.98%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.20%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
26.22%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
17.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
6.03%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BRK-B and FCNTX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 1996

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between BRK-B and FCNTX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRK-B vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRK-BFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.27

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

1.89

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

8.00

-8.29

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRK-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRK-B and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRK-BFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

1.49

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.76

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.88

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.77

-0.29

Drawdowns

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRK-B drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-B and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRK-BFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.86%

-49.19%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-11.30%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-19.75%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-32.59%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

-32.59%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.78%

-2.98%

-6.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-8.16%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.66%

+1.83%

Volatility

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) is 3.98%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that BRK-B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRK-BFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.35%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

10.93%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

14.35%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

19.19%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

19.70%

-0.26%

Dividends

BRK-B vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.40%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRK-B and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-B dropped -53.86% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRK-B and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer