PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRGNX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BRGNX having a 11.36% return and SWPPX slightly higher at 11.69%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRGNX having a 15.21% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 15.63%.


BRGNX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.70%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.30%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.21%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRGNX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund
11.36%17.22%24.36%26.43%-19.15%26.14%20.79%31.30%-4.89%21.47%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BRGNX and SWPPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2011

0.99

The correlation between BRGNX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRGNX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRGNX
BRGNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BRGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BRGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRGNXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.36

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

15.67

-0.58

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRGNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRGNX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRGNXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.51

+0.28

Drawdowns

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRGNX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGNX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRGNXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-55.06%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.89%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-18.74%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-24.51%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-33.80%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-9.95%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.90%

+0.01%

Volatility

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRGNXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.83%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

8.98%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

11.87%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.93%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.23%

-0.02%

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRGNX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRGNX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

BRGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRGNX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund
2.45%2.71%1.32%1.44%1.77%1.83%1.46%2.76%2.40%2.59%3.92%5.41%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BRGNX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRGNX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGNX dropped -34.59% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRGNX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer