BREM vs. EMBX
BREM (iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF) and EMBX (VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BREM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EMBX.
Performance
BREM vs. EMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BREM achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than EMBX's 3.74% return.
BREM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMBX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
BREM vs. EMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.36% | 2.74% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 3.74% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BREM and EMBX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BREM vs. EMBX — Risk / Return Rank
BREM
EMBX
BREM vs. EMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.53 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
BREM vs. EMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BREM drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum EMBX drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BREM and EMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -25.11% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.38% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -7.08% | +6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
BREM vs. EMBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 5.73% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 6.10% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 6.65% | -0.96% |
BREM vs. EMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BREM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
BREM vs. EMBX - Dividend Comparison
BREM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than EMBX's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.90% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.90% | 6.95% | 8.20% | 5.49% | 8.21% | 5.50% | 6.56% | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.66% | 3.94% | 6.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BREM and EMBX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BREM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BREM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for EMBX.
EMBX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 3.90% for BREM.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BREM and 0.76% for EMBX.
Find the right allocation for BREM and EMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer