BREM vs. EMBX
BREM (iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF) and EMBX (VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BREM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EMBX.
Performance
BREM vs. EMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BREM achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than EMBX's 3.46% return.
BREM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
BREM vs. EMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.96% | 2.80% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 3.46% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BREM and EMBX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BREM vs. EMBX — Risk / Return Rank
BREM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMBX
BREM vs. EMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BREM vs. EMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BREM drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum EMBX drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BREM and EMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -25.11% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -1.10% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -7.05% | +6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility
BREM vs. EMBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BREM | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 5.97% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 6.14% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 6.67% | -1.08% |
BREM vs. EMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BREM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
BREM vs. EMBX - Dividend Comparison
BREM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than EMBX's 5.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.88% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.92% | 6.95% | 8.20% | 5.49% | 8.21% | 5.50% | 6.56% | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.66% | 3.94% | 6.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BREM and EMBX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BREM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BREM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for EMBX.
EMBX has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.88% for BREM.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BREM and 0.76% for EMBX.
Find the right allocation for BREM and EMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer