PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRCAX vs. ACSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCAX achieves a 32.52% return, which is significantly higher than ACSTX's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BRCAX has underperformed ACSTX with an annualized return of 7.75%, while ACSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


BRCAX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
32.52%
6M
33.47%
1Y
51.63%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
7.75%

ACSTX

1D
0.45%
1M
3.08%
YTD
9.14%
6M
10.66%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
32.52%18.41%5.47%-3.44%7.77%19.18%7.75%4.20%-12.18%4.49%
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
9.14%17.22%15.00%12.37%0.74%33.33%-0.78%24.35%-12.34%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BRCAX and ACSTX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between BRCAX and ACSTX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRCAX vs. ACSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRCAX
BRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSTX
ACSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRCAXACSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.41

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

3.06

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.91

11.64

+11.27

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRCAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the ACSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRCAX and ACSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRCAXACSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.27

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.51

-0.33

Drawdowns

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCAX drawdown since its inception was -60.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ACSTX drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCAX and ACSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCAXACSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.98%

-58.61%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-8.02%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-15.61%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-17.25%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.44%

-44.80%

+6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-0.24%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.50%

-9.35%

-19.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.10%

+0.19%

Volatility

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) at 2.48%. This indicates that BRCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCAXACSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

2.48%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.49%

8.01%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

10.84%

+6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

15.41%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

19.46%

-5.16%

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRCAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACSTX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRCAX vs. ACSTX - Dividend Comparison

BRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.58%, more than ACSTX's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
8.10%8.79%10.17%8.44%13.00%8.66%2.05%6.66%10.03%3.60%6.98%1.10%
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
10.58%14.02%4.85%3.80%9.98%16.92%0.00%0.89%0.17%0.00%2.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRCAX and ACSTX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRCAX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to ACSTX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRCAX dropped -60.98% vs ACSTX's -58.61%.

BRCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRCAX and ACSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer