BRAZ vs. DTCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BRAZ (Global X Brazil Active ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRAZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Solactive Brazil Mid Cap Index, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BRAZ returned 32.60% vs 84.73% for DTCR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRAZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.

Performance

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRAZ achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.

BRAZ

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -10.10%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 32.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DTCR

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 11.31%
• YTD: 52.56%
• 6M: 54.49%
• 1Y: 84.73%
• 3Y*: 36.32%
• 5Y*: 15.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BRAZ Global X Brazil Active ETF	9.24%	45.42%	-29.74%	17.56%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	52.56%	28.99%	14.92%	14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BRAZ and DTCR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2023	0.44

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRAZ	DTCR
Financial Services	38.2%	-
Energy	18.3%	-
Basic Materials	13.4%	-
Utilities	10.1%	-
Industrials	6.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	56.8%
Healthcare	2.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Technology	0.9%	40.8%
Communication Services	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

BRAZ vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRAZ

BRAZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
BRAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BRAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BRAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BRAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BRAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DTCR

DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 92
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRAZ	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	3.90	-2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	4.71	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.61	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	6.61	-4.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	20.78	-14.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRAZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRAZ and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRAZ	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	3.90	-2.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.76	-0.33

Drawdowns

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRAZ drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRAZ and DTCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRAZ	DTCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.02%	-38.98%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	-12.89%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.91%	-0.74%	-15.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.25%	-12.37%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	4.09%	+1.08%

Volatility

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) have volatilities of 6.95% and 7.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRAZ	DTCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.95%	7.16%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	16.92%	+3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.14%	21.84%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.58%	21.83%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.58%	21.90%	+1.68%

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRAZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRAZ vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

BRAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BRAZ Global X Brazil Active ETF	3.12%	3.41%	4.16%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.72%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRAZ and DTCR in my portfolio?

BRAZ and DTCR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRAZ or DTCR?

DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to BRAZ (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRAZ dropped -31.02% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

Which ETF is better, BRAZ or DTCR?

On 1-year performance, DTCR leads with 84.73% vs 32.60% for BRAZ. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BRAZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRAZ or DTCR?

Over the 1-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 84.73% return vs 32.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRAZ or DTCR?

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BRAZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRAZ or DTCR?

BRAZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

What is the main difference between BRAZ and DTCR?

BRAZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DTCR is REIT. BRAZ tracks Solactive Brazil Mid Cap Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BRAZ and 0.50% for DTCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.