PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BQLCX vs. TANDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BQLCX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -12.78% return.


BQLCX

1D
1.06%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.96%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
9.97%

TANDX

1D
1.06%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-12.78%
6M
-12.90%
1Y
-15.24%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
1.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BQLCX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund
1.76%9.54%6.70%20.96%-10.58%27.60%9.54%17.32%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-12.78%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BQLCX and TANDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.85

The correlation between BQLCX and TANDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BQLCX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BQLCX
BQLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BQLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BQLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BQLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BQLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BQLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BQLCXTANDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.75

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

-0.92

+2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

-2.18

+7.96

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BQLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BQLCX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BQLCXTANDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

-1.64

+2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.00

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.01

+0.68

Drawdowns

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BQLCX drawdown since its inception was -34.47%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BQLCX and TANDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BQLCXTANDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.47%

-93.96%

+59.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-16.62%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.25%

-93.96%

+72.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.25%

-93.96%

+72.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-93.90%

+92.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-20.33%

+16.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

7.00%

-5.00%

Volatility

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.83%. This indicates that BQLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BQLCXTANDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.83%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

7.28%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

9.34%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

595.57%

-580.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

496.27%

-479.46%

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BQLCX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BQLCX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

BQLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than TANDX's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BQLCX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund
7.66%7.75%0.92%2.88%15.70%8.41%3.51%5.05%5.11%2.71%3.59%3.26%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
7.08%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BQLCX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BQLCX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TANDX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BQLCX dropped -34.47% vs TANDX's -93.96%.

BQLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BQLCX and TANDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer