PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPTRX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPTRX achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.07% return. Over the past 10 years, BPTRX has outperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 25.50%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.75% annualized return.


BPTRX

1D
-1.26%
1M
14.33%
YTD
12.47%
6M
9.60%
1Y
52.92%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
25.50%

FTQGX

1D
2.51%
1M
9.08%
YTD
32.07%
6M
32.21%
1Y
56.90%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
19.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
12.47%24.54%32.75%43.09%-42.53%31.35%148.81%44.99%-2.01%31.54%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.07%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BPTRX and FTQGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1996

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between BPTRX and FTQGX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPTRX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPTRXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

4.41

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

18.55

-6.52

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTRX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTRX drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, roughly equal to the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTRX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPTRXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-61.29%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-12.76%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.34%

-26.84%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-32.31%

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-32.31%

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

0.00%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-14.17%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.03%

+1.35%

Volatility

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) at 8.94%. This indicates that BPTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPTRXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.09%

8.94%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

17.12%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

21.33%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.94%

21.96%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.86%

21.71%

+11.15%

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPTRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPTRX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

BPTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than FTQGX's 9.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
2.99%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.42%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPTRX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPTRX has higher volatility (11.09%) compared to FTQGX (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPTRX dropped -64.11% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPTRX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer