PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPTIX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPTIX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's 4.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BPTIX has outperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 25.16%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.55% annualized return.


BPTIX

1D
1.57%
1M
-0.74%
6M
8.78%
YTD
8.59%
1Y
42.75%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
25.16%

VRGWX

1D
1.27%
1M
1.50%
6M
3.88%
YTD
4.54%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPTIX
Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class
8.59%24.86%33.09%43.47%-42.39%31.69%149.45%47.29%-1.75%31.91%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.54%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BPTIX and VRGWX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between BPTIX and VRGWX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPTIX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTIX
BPTIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BPTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPTIXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

0.97

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

3.08

+7.22

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTIX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTIX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTIX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPTIXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-32.70%

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-16.19%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.29%

-23.44%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.72%

-32.70%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-32.70%

-18.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-4.09%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-4.88%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

5.08%

-0.31%

Volatility

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) at 6.55%. This indicates that BPTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPTIXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

6.55%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

13.29%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.95%

16.63%

+13.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.16%

21.83%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

21.21%

+11.67%

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPTIX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPTIX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

BPTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than VRGWX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTIX
Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class
2.95%3.21%0.73%0.00%3.07%7.46%3.57%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.47%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPTIX and VRGWX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPTIX has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to VRGWX (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPTIX dropped -51.26% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

BPTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPTIX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer