PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPSIX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund Class I (BPSIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPSIX achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -0.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BPSIX having a 9.69% annualized return and ARSMX not far behind at 9.25%.


BPSIX

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.81%
YTD
10.61%
6M
11.59%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
9.69%

ARSMX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-5.59%
1Y
0.64%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPSIX
Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund Class I
10.61%7.45%13.95%16.98%-11.48%25.67%1.60%28.06%-16.42%9.72%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.73%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BPSIX and ARSMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.93

The correlation between BPSIX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPSIX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPSIX
BPSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BPSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BPSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund Class I (BPSIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPSIXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.01

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.02

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

0.05

+6.20

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPSIX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPSIXARSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.02

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.35

+0.13

Drawdowns

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPSIX drawdown since its inception was -62.51%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPSIX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPSIXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.51%

-51.75%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-10.37%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-19.34%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

-19.34%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.79%

-42.96%

-4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-8.18%

+7.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-8.11%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.37%

-0.93%

Volatility

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund Class I (BPSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.68%. This indicates that BPSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPSIXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.68%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

10.16%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

14.36%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

17.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

19.57%

+2.55%

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPSIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPSIX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

BPSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
BPSIX
Boston Partners Small Cap Value Fund Class I
6.83%7.56%14.43%12.77%7.64%7.03%0.54%2.42%6.95%4.50%2.22%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPSIX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPSIX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to ARSMX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPSIX dropped -62.51% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

BPSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPSIX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer