PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPRLX vs. CIHEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPRLX achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than CIHEX's 5.52% return.


BPRLX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.49%
YTD
5.08%
6M
4.97%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

CIHEX

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.36%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
5.08%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%
CIHEX
Calamos Hedged Equity Fund
5.52%11.36%14.96%15.88%-11.11%13.31%9.66%14.47%0.87%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BPRLX and CIHEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.91

The correlation between BPRLX and CIHEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPRLX vs. CIHEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CIHEX
CIHEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CIHEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIHEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIHEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CIHEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIHEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPRLXCIHEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.42

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.26

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.00

13.98

+5.01

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the CIHEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPRLX and CIHEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPRLX drawdown since its inception was -24.28%, which is greater than CIHEX's maximum drawdown of -17.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPRLX and CIHEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPRLXCIHEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.28%

-17.80%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-4.68%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-9.80%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-15.77%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.07%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-2.31%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.09%

-0.41%

Volatility

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) is 1.45%, while Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that BPRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIHEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPRLXCIHEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

2.66%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

5.30%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20%

6.78%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

9.20%

+6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

9.41%

+5.61%

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPRLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CIHEX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPRLX vs. CIHEX - Dividend Comparison

BPRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than CIHEX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.94%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%0.00%0.00%
CIHEX
Calamos Hedged Equity Fund
0.30%0.33%0.46%0.69%0.73%0.44%1.03%0.99%3.16%0.85%1.29%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BPRLX and CIHEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CIHEX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to BPRLX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPRLX dropped -24.28% vs CIHEX's -17.80%.

BPRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPRLX and CIHEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer