PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAVX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAVX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BPAVX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


BPAVX

1D
0.85%
1M
6.14%
YTD
10.48%
6M
11.90%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.44%

FGINX

1D
0.92%
1M
7.14%
YTD
17.90%
6M
22.44%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
10.48%17.17%9.66%12.25%-2.63%25.22%3.85%27.58%-12.09%17.60%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
17.90%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAVX and FGINX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2002

0.94

The correlation between BPAVX and FGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPAVX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAVX
BPAVX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BPAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPAVXFGINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

4.01

-1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

5.51

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.72

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

6.20

-3.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.55

23.67

-13.12

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAVX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPAVXFGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

4.01

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.10

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Drawdowns

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAVX drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAVX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAVXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.62%

-54.80%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-7.34%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-13.28%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-16.21%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-37.37%

-3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-9.70%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.91%

+0.47%

Volatility

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPAVXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

8.23%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

11.36%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

14.88%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.04%

+1.29%

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAVX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPAVX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

BPAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than FGINX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
8.35%9.22%10.23%10.94%8.42%5.21%1.42%2.34%6.38%4.11%3.70%6.44%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.64%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPAVX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPAVX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to FGINX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAVX dropped -49.62% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPAVX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer