BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L
BOTZ.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ.L is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOTZ.L returned 6.51%/yr vs 41.58%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOTZ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.
Performance
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BOTZ.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTZ.L achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's -9.39% return.
BOTZ.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.36%
- 6M
- -20.80%
- YTD
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- 58.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc | -2.78% | 13.45% | 13.02% | 40.20% | -13.52% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -9.39% | 173.15% | 11.64% | -1.40% | -9.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTZ.L and SILG.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022 | 0.39 |
The correlation between BOTZ.L and SILG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BOTZ.L
SILG.L
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTZ.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.52 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 3.40 | -1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTZ.L drawdown since its inception was -53.16%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ.L and SILG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTZ.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.16% | -38.86% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -38.86% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.07% | -38.86% | +9.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.07% | -35.74% | +21.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -13.72% | -9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 17.30% | -10.73% |
Volatility
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) is 8.94%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that BOTZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTZ.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 15.78% | -6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 44.46% | -23.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.02% | 55.10% | -29.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 43.42% | -16.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 43.42% | -16.95% |
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTZ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOTZ.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOTZ.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOTZ.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOTZ.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOTZ.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
BOTZ.L is categorized as Robotics, while SILG.L is Silver. BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTZ.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.
Find the right allocation for BOTZ.L and SILG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer