PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOTZ.L is traded in USD, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ.L achieves a -2.78% return, which is significantly lower than RBTX.L's 24.77% return.


BOTZ.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-6.69%
6M
-6.46%
YTD
-2.78%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
10Y*

RBTX.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
-5.27%
6M
19.61%
YTD
24.77%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOTZ.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
-2.78%13.45%13.02%40.20%-42.86%-5.58%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
24.77%17.41%5.72%39.02%-34.40%-1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ.L and RBTX.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.86

The correlation between BOTZ.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ.L
BOTZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZ.LRBTX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.16

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

7.09

-5.53

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ.L and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ.L drawdown since its inception was -53.16%, which is greater than RBTX.L's maximum drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ.L and RBTX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZ.LRBTX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.16%

-44.44%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-15.36%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.07%

-24.96%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.07%

-7.06%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-12.04%

-11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

4.70%

+1.87%

Volatility

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (BOTZ.L) is 8.94%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that BOTZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBTX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZ.LRBTX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

10.31%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

21.33%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.02%

25.20%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

27.47%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

25.79%

+0.68%

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBTX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOTZ.L nor RBTX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ.L and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTZ.L.

BOTZ.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTZ.L and 0.40% for RBTX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ.L and RBTX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer