PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOSC vs. GLDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOSC vs. GLDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOSC achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than GLDD's 29.57% return. Over the past 10 years, BOSC has underperformed GLDD with an annualized return of 1.64%, while GLDD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.


BOSC

1D
3.65%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-3.07%
1Y
-9.75%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
1.64%

GLDD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
29.57%
6M
30.27%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
32.55%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOSC vs. GLDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
-6.58%38.18%25.00%26.44%-28.86%29.30%14.07%-8.29%-0.91%3.30%
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation
29.57%16.21%47.01%29.08%-62.15%19.36%16.24%71.15%22.59%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BOSC and GLDD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2006

0.07

The correlation between BOSC and GLDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BOSC:

$0.83

GLDD:

$1.09

PE Ratio

BOSC:

5.15

GLDD:

15.60

PEG Ratio

BOSC:

0.07

GLDD:

0.26

PS Ratio

BOSC:

0.37

GLDD:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOSC:

$50.57M

GLDD:

$888.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOSC:

$12.08M

GLDD:

$203.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

BOSC:

$4.65M

GLDD:

$125.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOSC vs. GLDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOSC
BOSC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BOSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDD
GLDD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GLDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOSC vs. GLDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOSCGLDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

1.48

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.01

2.53

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.33

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.16

-3.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

9.69

-9.96

BOSC vs. GLDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOSC Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the GLDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOSC and GLDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOSCGLDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

1.48

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.07

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.33

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.12

-0.26

Drawdowns

BOSC vs. GLDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOSC drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than GLDD's maximum drawdown of -80.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSC and GLDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOSCGLDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.90%

-80.76%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.73%

-14.74%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.13%

-39.75%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.35%

-70.30%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.34%

-70.32%

+5.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.70%

0.00%

-99.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.50%

-32.87%

-56.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.95%

4.79%

+17.16%

Volatility

BOSC vs. GLDD - Volatility Comparison

B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) at 0.00%. This indicates that BOSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOSCGLDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

0.00%

+14.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.09%

19.04%

+11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.75%

31.60%

+13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.22%

41.24%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.26%

42.65%

+9.61%

Dividends

BOSC vs. GLDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOSC nor GLDD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BOSC vs. GLDD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
12.62M
256.45M
(BOSC) Total Revenue
(GLDD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BOSC vs. GLDD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
23.9%
20.9%
Portfolio components
BOSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 3.02M and revenue of 12.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

GLDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.64M and revenue of 256.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

BOSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 812.00K and revenue of 12.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

GLDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported an operating income of 30.34M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

BOSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 819.00K and revenue of 12.62M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

GLDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a net income of 12.63M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOSC and GLDD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOSC has higher volatility (14.77%) compared to GLDD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOSC dropped -99.90% vs GLDD's -80.76%.

GLDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOSC and GLDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer