PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOPIX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund (BOPIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOPIX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 14.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BOPIX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.


BOPIX

1D
1.05%
1M
8.46%
YTD
12.93%
6M
12.50%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
13.50%

RCKSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.42%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOPIX
Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund
12.93%13.38%21.00%25.16%-20.04%27.75%13.46%35.34%-4.54%19.63%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.10%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BOPIX and RCKSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.86

The correlation between BOPIX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOPIX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOPIX
BOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund (BOPIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOPIXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.83

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

2.66

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

5.11

-2.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.66

14.18

-6.53

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOPIX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOPIXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.83

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.48

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.38

+0.25

Drawdowns

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOPIX drawdown since its inception was -51.68%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOPIX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOPIXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.68%

-57.88%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-4.14%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-18.22%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.02%

-22.54%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

-33.10%

-5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-9.51%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

1.49%

+2.79%

Volatility

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund (BOPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 2.94%. This indicates that BOPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOPIXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.94%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

8.06%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

11.56%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

15.66%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

17.55%

+1.79%

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOPIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOPIX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

BOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.71%, more than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOPIX
Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund
16.71%18.87%16.95%17.90%7.84%12.03%1.24%10.09%9.17%7.89%1.88%15.18%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.48%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOPIX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOPIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to RCKSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOPIX dropped -51.68% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

BOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOPIX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer