BOND vs. AFIF
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF).
BOND and AFIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOND is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 1, 2012. AFIF is an actively managed fund by Regents Park Funds. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018.
Performance
BOND vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOND achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than AFIF's 0.09% return.
BOND
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.25%
AFIF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
BOND vs. AFIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.33% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 1.36% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 0.09% | 6.56% | 7.06% | 9.73% | -5.38% | -0.50% | 2.14% | 0.41% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOND and AFIF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
BOND vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOND has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIF's 1.08% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOND vs. AFIF — Risk / Return Rank
BOND
AFIF
BOND vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOND | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.41 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.96 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.79 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 11.48 | -6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOND | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.41 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.75 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.40 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
BOND vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOND drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, which is greater than AFIF's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND and AFIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOND | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -10.29% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -1.63% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -8.85% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.99% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -2.27% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.43% | +0.70% |
Volatility
BOND vs. AFIF - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) at 1.32%. This indicates that BOND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOND | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 1.32% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.13% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 3.55% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 4.47% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 6.32% | -1.25% |
Dividends
BOND vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison
BOND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than AFIF's 3.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.17% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.69% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |