PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOND.AX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than DJRE.AX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BOND.AX has underperformed DJRE.AX with an annualized return of 1.40%, while DJRE.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.56% annualized return.


BOND.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
1.38%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.40%

DJRE.AX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.75%
6M
6.26%
YTD
6.95%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
1.98%3.65%2.45%5.10%-11.40%-3.40%3.81%7.79%4.70%3.50%
DJRE.AX
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF
6.95%2.61%7.87%11.14%-20.36%38.59%-19.06%18.19%4.70%-0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BOND.AX and DJRE.AX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.14

Over the past year, BOND.AX and DJRE.AX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOND.AX
BOND.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DJRE.AX
DJRE.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DJRE.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOND.AXDJRE.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.15

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

2.83

-1.33

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the DJRE.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOND.AX and DJRE.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOND.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.15%, smaller than the maximum DJRE.AX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND.AX and DJRE.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOND.AXDJRE.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-35.10%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-8.85%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.16%

-11.63%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-24.27%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.15%

-35.10%

+17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-1.74%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-8.53%

+4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.63%

-2.02%

Volatility

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) is 0.83%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that BOND.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJRE.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOND.AXDJRE.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

4.72%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

10.68%

-7.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

13.49%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

15.16%

-9.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

15.99%

-10.98%

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOND.AX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DJRE.AX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BOND.AX vs. DJRE.AX - Dividend Comparison

BOND.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than DJRE.AX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
4.09%2.90%1.06%0.17%0.73%1.87%1.60%1.76%2.62%2.67%3.64%3.41%
DJRE.AX
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF
2.69%2.82%1.70%2.80%6.57%2.81%2.62%2.68%4.20%3.45%3.22%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOND.AX and DJRE.AX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOND.AX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOND.AX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DJRE.AX.

BOND.AX is categorized as Total Bond Market, while DJRE.AX is REIT. BOND.AX tracks S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Fixed Interest Diversified 0+ Index, while DJRE.AX tracks Dow Jones Global Select ESG Tilted Real Estate Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BOND.AX and 0.20% for DJRE.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOND.AX and DJRE.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer