PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) and BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOND.AX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than BNDS.AX's 1.05% return.


BOND.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
1.38%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.40%

BNDS.AX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.24%
6M
0.79%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
0.62%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
-0.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
1.98%3.65%2.45%5.10%-11.40%-3.40%3.81%7.79%2.18%
BNDS.AX
BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF
1.05%2.52%3.08%5.73%-10.96%-2.83%4.81%7.50%2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BOND.AX and BNDS.AX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.78

The correlation between BOND.AX and BNDS.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOND.AX
BOND.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDS.AX
BNDS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BNDS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) and BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOND.AXBNDS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.03

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.14

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

0.27

+1.23

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the BNDS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOND.AX and BNDS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOND.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.15%, which is greater than BNDS.AX's maximum drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND.AX and BNDS.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOND.AXBNDS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-16.27%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-5.05%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.16%

-5.05%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-16.11%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.92%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-5.37%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.59%

-0.98%

Volatility

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX) at 0.78%. This indicates that BOND.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOND.AXBNDS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.78%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

3.05%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

3.73%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

5.36%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

5.23%

-0.22%

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOND.AX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDS.AX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOND.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Dividend Comparison

BOND.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than BNDS.AX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDS.AX
BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF
2.98%3.39%3.31%2.63%1.47%1.25%2.46%2.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
4.09%2.90%1.06%0.17%0.73%1.87%1.60%1.76%2.62%2.67%3.64%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOND.AX and BNDS.AX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOND.AX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOND.AX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BNDS.AX.

They also come from different issuers: SPDR and BetaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BOND.AX and 0.42% for BNDS.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOND.AX and BNDS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer