PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOBP vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOBP vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.


BOBP

1D
0.43%
1M
9.07%
YTD
24.96%
6M
24.49%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOBP vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and RSSY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOBP vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOBP vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOBPRSSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.65

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

6.53

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

22.39

-10.64

BOBP vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOBP and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOBPRSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.63

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

0.75

+1.15

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOBPRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-29.57%

+16.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-7.36%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-7.37%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.14%

+0.81%

Volatility

BOBP vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that BOBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOBPRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

2.30%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

9.92%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

13.28%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.35%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.35%

-0.08%

BOBP vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOBP vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than RSSY's 1.54% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOBP and RSSY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOBP has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -13.06% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 34.52% for BOBP. On fees, BOBP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOBP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

BOBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.54% for RSSY.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOBP and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer