BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNXG.DE (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) and SP2Q.DE (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BNXG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while SP2Q.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNXG.DE returned 12.34%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for SP2Q.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNXG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SP2Q.DE.

Performance

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNXG.DE achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than SP2Q.DE's 10.37% return.

BNXG.DE

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 25.60%
• 6M: 18.37%
• 1Y: 54.31%
• 3Y*: 42.07%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

SP2Q.DE

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 10.37%
• 6M: 10.31%
• 1Y: 18.06%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNXG.DE Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	25.60%	30.08%	24.44%	61.89%	-49.28%	-10.22%
SP2Q.DE Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc	10.37%	-0.55%	18.83%	9.91%	-6.71%	31.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	0.51

The correlation between BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNXG.DE

BNXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 37
BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BNXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BNXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BNXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BNXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SP2Q.DE

SP2Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 54
SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SP2Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SP2Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SP2Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SP2Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNXG.DE	SP2Q.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.64	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.32	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	3.43	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	10.24	-6.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNXG.DE	SP2Q.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.64	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.61	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.75	-0.09

Drawdowns

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than SP2Q.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNXG.DE	SP2Q.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.23%	-22.73%	-34.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.72%	-5.11%	-24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.54%	-22.73%	-15.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.23%	-22.73%	-34.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.77%	0.00%	-4.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.04%	-5.22%	-15.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.69%	1.71%	+12.98%

Volatility

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) at 2.04%. This indicates that BNXG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SP2Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNXG.DE	SP2Q.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.95%	2.04%	+7.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.00%	6.81%	+18.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.88%	10.66%	+29.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.22%	14.91%	+21.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.37%	15.44%	+19.93%

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNXG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SP2Q.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNXG.DE vs. SP2Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNXG.DE nor SP2Q.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE in my portfolio?

BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BNXG.DE or SP2Q.DE?

On fees, SP2Q.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNXG.DE or SP2Q.DE?

SP2Q.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

What is the main difference between BNXG.DE and SP2Q.DE?

BNXG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while SP2Q.DE is S&P 500. BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while SP2Q.DE tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BNXG.DE and 0.20% for SP2Q.DE.