BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE
BNXG.DE (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNXG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNXG.DE returned 12.34%/yr vs 36.20%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNXG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNXG.DE achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.
BNXG.DE
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 6M
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 57.31%
- 3Y*
- 42.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNXG.DE Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 25.60% | 30.08% | 24.44% | 61.89% | -49.28% | 37.62% | 73.64% | 15.23% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 29.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNXG.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BNXG.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BNXG.DE
LSMC.DE
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNXG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.59 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 10.37 | -8.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | 32.83 | -28.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNXG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 4.27 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.15 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.82 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNXG.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNXG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -39.77% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.72% | -12.53% | -17.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.54% | -36.22% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.23% | -39.77% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -3.34% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -9.37% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.69% | 3.96% | +10.73% |
Volatility
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) is 9.95%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that BNXG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNXG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | 11.23% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.00% | 22.18% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 30.40% | +9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 31.21% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 26.06% | +9.31% |
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNXG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNXG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNXG.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNXG.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.
BNXG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BNXG.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for BNXG.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer