PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNXG.DE achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than IEVD.DE's 36.10% return.


BNXG.DE

1D
-4.08%
1M
-14.08%
6M
-2.94%
YTD
10.93%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
31.52%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*

IEVD.DE

1D
-2.75%
1M
-11.10%
6M
30.91%
YTD
36.10%
1Y
50.89%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BNXG.DE
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc
10.93%30.08%24.44%61.89%-49.28%37.62%73.66%4.40%
IEVD.DE
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
36.10%10.71%5.35%22.95%-23.22%26.64%20.42%8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.64

The correlation between BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNXG.DE
BNXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVD.DE
IEVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNXG.DEIEVD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

3.19

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

10.45

-9.39

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than IEVD.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNXG.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-42.30%

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-15.87%

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.54%

-30.25%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.23%

-30.43%

-26.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.01%

-15.87%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.11%

-9.69%

-11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.07%

4.86%

+10.21%

Volatility

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) have volatilities of 9.95% and 9.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNXG.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

9.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.32%

23.23%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.12%

27.19%

+13.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.60%

22.98%

+13.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

24.24%

+11.39%

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNXG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IEVD.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNXG.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNXG.DE nor IEVD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEVD.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEVD.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BNXG.DE and 0.40% for IEVD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNXG.DE and IEVD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer