BNS vs. USFR
BNS (The Bank of Nova Scotia) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, BNS returned 12.01%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BNS vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNS achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BNS has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 12.01%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
BNS
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- 1Y
- 64.79%
- 3Y*
- 29.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
BNS vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 18.34% | 45.11% | 17.55% | 8.53% | -28.05% | 40.62% | 1.70% | 17.49% | -18.28% | 21.83% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNS and USFR is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.00 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BNS and USFR has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.20, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNS vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
BNS
USFR
BNS vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -44.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 13.31 | -11.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 201.33 | -196.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.10 | 779.76 | -760.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNS vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNS drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.65% | -1.36% | -62.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.36% | -0.02% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -0.06% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.12% | -0.18% | -38.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -0.80% | -45.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | 0.00% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -0.15% | -10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 0.01% | +3.39% |
Volatility
BNS vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that BNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNS | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 0.09% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 0.19% | +12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 0.27% | +16.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 0.40% | +19.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 0.78% | +21.10% |
Dividends
BNS vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
BNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.73% | 4.17% | 5.85% | 8.56% | 6.39% | 5.09% | 4.93% | 3.53% | 6.34% | 4.80% | 5.24% | 8.13% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNS and USFR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNS has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNS dropped -63.65% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 3.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNS and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer