PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNS vs. AMGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BNS vs. AMGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNS achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMGN's 10.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BNS having a 11.61% annualized return and AMGN not far ahead at 12.08%.


BNS

1D
1.57%
1M
8.96%
YTD
16.52%
6M
17.99%
1Y
62.38%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
11.61%

AMGN

1D
0.32%
1M
8.85%
YTD
10.10%
6M
13.41%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNS vs. AMGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNS
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.52%45.11%17.55%8.53%-28.05%40.62%1.70%17.49%-18.28%21.83%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
10.10%29.67%-6.77%13.46%20.43%0.87%-1.99%27.60%15.23%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BNS and AMGN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1999

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BNS:

$76.13B

AMGN:

$193.23B

EPS

BNS:

CA$8.23

AMGN:

$14.38

PE Ratio

BNS:

14.26

AMGN:

24.70

PS Ratio

BNS:

1.93

AMGN:

5.17

PB Ratio

BNS:

1.38

AMGN:

21.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNS:

CA$70.57B

AMGN:

$37.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNS:

CA$33.43B

AMGN:

$26.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

BNS:

CA$13.61B

AMGN:

$17.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNS vs. AMGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNS
BNS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNS vs. AMGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNSAMGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.17

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

1.40

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.38

3.22

+15.16

BNS vs. AMGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNS Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the AMGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNS and AMGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNS vs. AMGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNS drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AMGN drawdown of -63.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS and AMGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNSAMGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.65%

-63.48%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-16.57%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-22.74%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.12%

-24.86%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-24.86%

-21.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.80%

+7.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-16.77%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

7.19%

-3.79%

Volatility

BNS vs. AMGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) is 4.91%, while Amgen Inc. (AMGN) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that BNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNSAMGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

7.92%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

19.22%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

27.79%

-10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

23.97%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

24.86%

-2.94%

Dividends

BNS vs. AMGN - Dividend Comparison

BNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than AMGN's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.76%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
BNS
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.79%4.17%5.85%8.56%6.39%5.09%4.93%3.53%6.34%4.80%5.24%8.13%

Financials

BNS vs. AMGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of Nova Scotia and Amgen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
17.18B
8.62B
(BNS) Total Revenue
(AMGN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BNS values in CAD, AMGN values in USD

BNS vs. AMGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Bank of Nova Scotia and Amgen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.9%
68.2%
Portfolio components
BNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a gross profit of 8.40B and revenue of 17.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

AMGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.87B and revenue of 8.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

BNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported an operating income of 3.43B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

AMGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

BNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a net income of 2.59B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

AMGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BNS and AMGN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMGN has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to BNS (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNS dropped -63.65% vs AMGN's -63.48%.

BNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNS and AMGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer