BNKU.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

BNKU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKU.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Banks and Diversified Financials Select Index, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. BNKU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKU.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BNKU.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

BNKU.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 4.77%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 1Y: 19.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	$3.11M	$2.94M	$3.16M

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU.L Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	8.92%	16.71%

Return for Risk

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKU.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKU.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.71	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.07%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.20%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.00%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BNKU.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.58%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.23%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.23%	—

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BNKU.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

BNKU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

Position	TTM
BNKU.L Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BNKU.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BNKU.L.

What is the main difference between BNKU.L and PACW.L?

BNKU.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. BNKU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Banks and Diversified Financials Select Index, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BNKU.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.