PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKS.L achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly higher than WFIN.L's 8.91% return.


BNKS.L

1D
0.81%
1M
4.92%
6M
13.65%
YTD
13.36%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

WFIN.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.66%
6M
9.60%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
24.93%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks
13.36%20.47%27.74%-3.09%-18.79%39.71%-11.77%33.02%-23.57%
WFIN.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc
8.91%29.17%26.82%16.20%-9.85%28.37%-2.96%24.94%-16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKS.L and WFIN.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.85

The correlation between BNKS.L and WFIN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKS.L
BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIN.L
WFIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNKS.LWFIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.98

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

6.54

-2.23

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKS.L and WFIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, smaller than the maximum WFIN.L drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKS.L and WFIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKS.LWFIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.35%

-72.88%

+21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-11.06%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.47%

-15.69%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.15%

-27.48%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.10%

-18.23%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

3.36%

+2.78%

Volatility

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that BNKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKS.LWFIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.95%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

11.95%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

14.60%

+6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.79%

17.85%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.64%

18.87%

+11.77%

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WFIN.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKS.L vs. WFIN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKS.L nor WFIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BNKS.L and WFIN.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WFIN.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WFIN.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNKS.L.

BNKS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while WFIN.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNKS.L and 0.30% for WFIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKS.L and WFIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer