BNKS.L vs. FING.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNKS.L (iShares S&P U.S. Banks) and FING.L (Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Financials Equities funds - BNKS.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while FING.L tracks the Indxx Global Fintech Thematic. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BNKS.L returned 26.30%/yr vs 6.46%/yr for FING.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNKS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FING.L.

Performance

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BNKS.L is traded in USD, while FING.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FING.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKS.L achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than FING.L's -15.39% return.

BNKS.L

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 27.90%
• 3Y*: 26.30%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: —

FING.L

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: -15.39%
• 6M: -17.15%
• 1Y: -19.86%
• 3Y*: 6.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks	3.61%	20.45%	28.55%	-3.74%	-18.79%	-4.26%
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing	-15.39%	-5.54%	21.97%	35.90%	-52.90%	-12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKS.L and FING.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021	0.54

The correlation between BNKS.L and FING.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKS.L	FING.L
Financial Services	100.0%	40.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.4%
Industrials	-	3.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	54.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKS.L vs. FING.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKS.L

BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FING.L

FING.L Risk / Return Rank: 4
FING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKS.L	FING.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	-0.74	+2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-0.91	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.89	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	-0.54	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	-1.02	+5.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the FING.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKS.L and FING.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKS.L	FING.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	-0.74	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	-0.41	+0.61

Drawdowns

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, smaller than the maximum FING.L drawdown of -60.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKS.L and FING.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKS.L	FING.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.35%	-60.60%	+9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.88%	-36.53%	+19.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.47%	-36.53%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.58%	-45.57%	+39.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-42.47%	+24.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.12%	19.39%	-13.27%

Volatility

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) is 6.48%, while Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that BNKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FING.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKS.L	FING.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	7.87%	-1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	20.77%	-4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.82%	26.96%	-6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.66%	30.65%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.51%	30.65%	+0.86%

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FING.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKS.L vs. FING.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKS.L nor FING.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKS.L and FING.L in my portfolio?

BNKS.L and FING.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BNKS.L or FING.L?

On fees, BNKS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKS.L or FING.L?

BNKS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FING.L.

What is the main difference between BNKS.L and FING.L?

BNKS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while FING.L tracks Indxx Global Fintech Thematic. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNKS.L and 0.60% for FING.L.