BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNKE.L (Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and CWEU.L (Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKE.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while CWEU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BNKE.L returned 46.04%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for CWEU.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKE.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CWEU.L.

Performance

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BNKE.L is traded in GBP, while CWEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CWEU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKE.L achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than CWEU.L's 31.41% return.

BNKE.L

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.68%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 45.15%
• 3Y*: 46.04%
• 5Y*: 29.25%
• 10Y*: —

CWEU.L

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 31.41%
• 6M: 29.43%
• 1Y: 56.56%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	4.63%	99.94%	25.19%	27.75%	6.62%	10.75%
CWEU.L Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD	31.41%	17.28%	-19.78%	-2.65%	59.88%	14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKE.L and CWEU.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021	0.06

The correlation between BNKE.L and CWEU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKE.L	CWEU.L
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	17.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	12.8%
Energy	-	48.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	14.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	6.8%

Return for Risk

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKE.L

BNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CWEU.L

CWEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CWEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CWEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CWEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CWEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKE.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	3.30	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	4.47	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.59	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	6.57	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	25.16	-16.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKE.L and CWEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKE.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	3.30	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.36	-0.61

Drawdowns

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKE.L drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, which is greater than CWEU.L's maximum drawdown of -36.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKE.L and CWEU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKE.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.52%	-36.66%	-11.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.66%	-8.57%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	-30.14%	+11.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-1.33%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-15.21%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	2.24%	+2.93%

Volatility

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKE.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	6.09%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.62%	13.50%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.28%	17.05%	+6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	33.82%	-8.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.62%	33.82%	-4.20%

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CWEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKE.L vs. CWEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKE.L nor CWEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKE.L and CWEU.L in my portfolio?

BNKE.L and CWEU.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BNKE.L or CWEU.L?

On fees, CWEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKE.L or CWEU.L?

CWEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.

What is the main difference between BNKE.L and CWEU.L?

BNKE.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while CWEU.L is Energy Equities. BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while CWEU.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BNKE.L and 0.25% for CWEU.L.