BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Big Banc Split Corp. (BNK.TO) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO).

Performance

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Big Banc Split Corp. (BNK.TO) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BNK.TO Big Banc Split Corp.	-2.50%	54.60%	30.16%	15.97%	-22.25%	82.74%	21.88%
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp.	-3.37%	64.98%	32.81%	5.77%	-2.76%	59.70%	87.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNK.TO achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than LBS.TO's -3.37% return.

BNK.TO

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -6.43%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 35.65%
• 3Y*: 27.96%
• 5Y*: 20.48%
• 10Y*: —

LBS.TO

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -7.18%
• YTD: -3.37%
• 6M: 22.10%
• 1Y: 64.74%
• 3Y*: 29.17%
• 5Y*: 22.61%
• 10Y*: 18.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNK.TO

BNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
BNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LBS.TO

LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Big Banc Split Corp. (BNK.TO) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNK.TO	LBS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	3.11	-1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.70	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.55	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	4.69	-1.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.41	21.47	-7.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNK.TO and LBS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNK.TO	LBS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	3.11	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.93	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.29	+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between BNK.TO and LBS.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than LBS.TO's 9.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNK.TO Big Banc Split Corp.	7.96%	8.35%	12.69%	25.49%	17.26%	12.75%	3.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp.	9.19%	9.34%	13.29%	15.23%	13.89%	11.89%	5.56%	15.06%	17.96%	12.05%	12.35%	14.91%

Drawdowns

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum LBS.TO drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNK.TO and LBS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNK.TO	LBS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.03%	-83.80%	+42.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-14.34%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.03%	-39.58%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.65%	-8.81%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-13.92%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	3.14%	-0.46%

Volatility

BNK.TO vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Big Banc Split Corp. (BNK.TO) is 10.41%, while Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that BNK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNK.TO	LBS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.41%	13.01%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	17.18%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	20.95%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.97%	24.38%	+3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.61%	37.14%	-9.53%

Financials