BNGE vs. CHPS
BNGE (First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNGE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S-Network Streaming & Gaming Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BNGE returned 12.35%/yr vs 51.76%/yr for CHPS. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BNGE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
BNGE vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNGE achieves a -16.13% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 79.10% return.
BNGE
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -16.13%
- 1Y
- -16.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.35%
CHPS
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- 6M
- 57.99%
- YTD
- 79.10%
- 1Y
- 150.44%
- 3Y*
- 51.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 48.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.55K | $38.53K | $25.93K | |
| $3.26M | $2.66M | $3.97M |
BNGE vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNGE First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF | -16.13% | 35.18% | 19.23% | 3.02% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 79.10% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNGE and CHPS is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BNGE and CHPS has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BNGE vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNGE
CHPS
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
BNGE
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
BNGE
CHPS
Technology
BNGE
CHPS
Basic Materials
BNGE
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
BNGE
-
CHPS
Energy
BNGE
-
CHPS
Financial Services
BNGE
-
CHPS
Healthcare
BNGE
-
CHPS
-
Industrials
BNGE
-
CHPS
Real Estate
BNGE
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
BNGE
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNGE vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
BNGE
CHPS
BNGE vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNGE | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.45 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 4.62 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 18.81 | -19.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNGE vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNGE drawdown since its inception was -40.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNGE and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNGE | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.54% | -39.44% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.88% | -32.74% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.88% | -39.44% | +11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.72% | -21.34% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -9.41% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.05% | 8.03% | +9.02% |
Volatility
BNGE vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) is 5.66%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.19%. This indicates that BNGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNGE | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 19.19% | -13.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 40.63% | -26.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 46.01% | -27.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 37.42% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 37.42% | -12.48% |
BNGE vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNGE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNGE vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
BNGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than CHPS's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNGE First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.01% | 0.81% | 0.59% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNGE and CHPS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.19%) compared to BNGE (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNGE dropped -40.54% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 51.76% vs 12.35% for BNGE. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BNGE has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 51.76% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BNGE.
BNGE has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.36% for CHPS.
BNGE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. BNGE tracks S-Network Streaming & Gaming Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BNGE and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNGE and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer