PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNGE vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNGE vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNGE achieves a -18.00% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.


BNGE

1D
-1.95%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-18.00%
6M
-18.35%
1Y
-6.57%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS

1D
1.86%
1M
32.32%
YTD
107.97%
6M
109.04%
1Y
223.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNGE vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF
-18.00%35.18%19.23%1.06%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
107.97%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BNGE and CHPS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023

0.60

The correlation between BNGE and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNGE vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BNGE
CHPS

Communication Services

66.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

26.7%

-

Technology

7.1%
98.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

BNGE
66.2%
CHPS

-

Consumer Cyclical

BNGE
26.7%
CHPS

-

Technology

BNGE
7.1%
CHPS
98.8%

Basic Materials

BNGE

-

CHPS

-

Consumer Defensive

BNGE

-

CHPS

-

Energy

BNGE

-

CHPS
0.5%

Financial Services

BNGE

-

CHPS
0.2%

Healthcare

BNGE

-

CHPS

-

Industrials

BNGE

-

CHPS
0.4%

Real Estate

BNGE

-

CHPS

-

Utilities

BNGE

-

CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNGE vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNGE
BNGE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BNGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNGE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BNGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNGE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNGE vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNGECHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.81

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

12.87

-13.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

49.99

-50.46

BNGE vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNGE Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNGE and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNGECHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

6.54

-6.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.81

-1.57

Drawdowns

BNGE vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNGE drawdown since its inception was -40.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNGE and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNGECHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.54%

-39.44%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.88%

-17.50%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.44%

0.00%

-24.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-9.16%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.00%

4.50%

+9.50%

Volatility

BNGE vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) is 4.26%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that BNGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNGECHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

14.18%

-9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

28.19%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

34.43%

-16.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

33.78%

-8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.18%

33.78%

-8.60%

BNGE vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNGE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNGE vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

BNGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF
1.08%0.89%0.01%0.81%0.59%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.32%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNGE and CHPS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to BNGE (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNGE dropped -40.54% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs -6.57% for BNGE. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BNGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs -6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BNGE.

BNGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.

BNGE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. BNGE tracks S-Network Streaming & Gaming Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BNGE and 0.15% for CHPS.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNGE and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer