BNDY vs. JUCY
BNDY (Horizon Core Bond ETF) and JUCY (Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BNDY returned 6.78% vs 7.35% for JUCY. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDY charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for JUCY.
Performance
BNDY vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDY achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than JUCY's 3.08% return.
BNDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUCY
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDY vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF | 0.82% | 5.21% |
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 3.08% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDY and JUCY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDY vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank
BNDY
JUCY
BNDY vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDY | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 7.87 | -6.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 30.50 | -23.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDY vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDY drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, which is greater than JUCY's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDY and JUCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDY | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -1.56% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.93% | -0.94% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.13% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -0.32% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.24% | +0.70% |
Volatility
BNDY vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) at 1.26%. This indicates that BNDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDY | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.26% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.24% | 2.38% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12% | 3.58% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 3.34% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 3.34% | +1.77% |
BNDY vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDY vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison
BNDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than JUCY's 8.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF | 5.87% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 8.15% | 7.98% | 7.83% | 9.31% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDY and JUCY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNDY has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to JUCY (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDY dropped -3.93% vs JUCY's -1.56%.
On 1-year performance, JUCY leads with 7.35% vs 6.78% for BNDY. On fees, JUCY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JUCY has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JUCY has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JUCY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BNDY.
JUCY has the higher dividend yield at 8.15%, compared with 5.87% for BNDY.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BNDY and 0.60% for JUCY.
JUCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNDY and JUCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer