PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDSY vs. CHFFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco de Sabadell SA ADR (BNDSY) and China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDSY achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than CHFFY's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDSY has outperformed CHFFY with an annualized return of 12.81%, while CHFFY has yielded a comparatively lower -0.13% annualized return.


BNDSY

1D
-4.48%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-4.96%
6M
8.93%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
66.62%
5Y*
44.07%
10Y*
12.81%

CHFFY

1D
2.43%
1M
2.43%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
-2.27%
1Y
70.22%
3Y*
26.18%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
-0.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDSY
Banco de Sabadell SA ADR
-4.96%122.06%87.70%22.17%56.78%53.11%-64.32%4.76%-38.45%41.52%
CHFFY
China Everbright International Ltd ADR
-2.27%69.26%51.25%-22.87%-38.80%42.97%-24.81%-16.06%-32.81%27.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDSY and CHFFY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BNDSY:

$16.18B

CHFFY:

$3.96B

EPS

BNDSY:

$0.38

CHFFY:

$12.27

PE Ratio

BNDSY:

17.01

CHFFY:

0.53

PS Ratio

BNDSY:

3.58

CHFFY:

0.07

PB Ratio

BNDSY:

1.16

CHFFY:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNDSY:

$7.76B

CHFFY:

$57.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNDSY:

$5.93B

CHFFY:

$22.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

BNDSY:

$937.74M

CHFFY:

$20.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDSY vs. CHFFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDSY
BNDSY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BNDSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDSY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDSY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CHFFY
CHFFY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHFFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHFFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHFFY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CHFFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHFFY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Sabadell SA ADR (BNDSY) and China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDSYCHFFYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.59

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

2.88

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.72

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.97

-3.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.87

15.24

-11.37

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDSY Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the CHFFY Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDSY and CHFFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDSYCHFFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.59

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.21

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

-0.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

-0.05

+0.12

Drawdowns

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDSY drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than CHFFY's maximum drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDSY and CHFFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSYCHFFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-75.84%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.62%

-14.35%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.04%

-23.03%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.56%

-54.47%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.83%

-75.84%

-10.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.42%

-38.94%

+24.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.80%

-47.69%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

4.65%

+2.24%

Volatility

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Volatility Comparison

Banco de Sabadell SA ADR (BNDSY) has a higher volatility of 17.39% compared to China Everbright International Ltd ADR (CHFFY) at 2.40%. This indicates that BNDSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHFFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDSYCHFFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.39%

2.40%

+14.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.32%

19.11%

+18.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.65%

44.96%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.31%

39.92%

+15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.91%

54.29%

+2.62%

Dividends

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Dividend Comparison

BNDSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.41%, more than CHFFY's 7.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDSY
Banco de Sabadell SA ADR
23.41%7.49%6.27%4.98%5.77%0.00%3.79%3.65%4.86%3.15%3.25%13.20%
CHFFY
China Everbright International Ltd ADR
7.14%4.55%6.62%9.70%9.03%6.09%3.23%0.00%0.00%3.25%2.92%0.00%

Financials

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco de Sabadell SA ADR and China Everbright International Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
1.79B
13.19B
(BNDSY) Total Revenue
(CHFFY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BNDSY vs. CHFFY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco de Sabadell SA ADR and China Everbright International Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
81.8%
36.0%
Portfolio components
BNDSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Sabadell SA ADR reported a gross profit of 1.46B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

CHFFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Everbright International Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 4.74B and revenue of 13.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.0%.

BNDSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Sabadell SA ADR reported an operating income of 445.20M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.

CHFFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Everbright International Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 13.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

BNDSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Sabadell SA ADR reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

CHFFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Everbright International Ltd ADR reported a net income of 1.76B and revenue of 13.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BNDSY and CHFFY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDSY has higher volatility (17.39%) compared to CHFFY (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDSY dropped -91.59% vs CHFFY's -75.84%.

CHFFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDSY and CHFFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer