BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX
BNDS.AX (BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF) and VAF.AX (Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds. BNDS.AX is actively managed, while VAF.AX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNDS.AX returned -0.31%/yr vs -0.70%/yr for VAF.AX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDS.AX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than VAF.AX's 0.68% return.
BNDS.AX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 0.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VAF.AX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 0.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDS.AX BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF | 1.05% | 2.52% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -10.96% | -2.83% | 4.81% | 7.50% | 2.15% |
VAF.AX Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF | 0.68% | 3.33% | 1.52% | 4.67% | -10.66% | -3.03% | 4.31% | 6.98% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDS.AX and VAF.AX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BNDS.AX and VAF.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX — Risk / Return Rank
BNDS.AX
VAF.AX
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX) and Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF (VAF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDS.AX | VAF.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 0.34 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDS.AX drawdown since its inception was -16.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VAF.AX drawdown of -16.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS.AX and VAF.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDS.AX | VAF.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -16.26% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -4.47% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.05% | -4.47% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -15.63% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -5.19% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -4.17% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.31% | +0.28% |
Volatility
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Volatility Comparison
BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF (VAF.AX) at 0.61%. This indicates that BNDS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDS.AX | VAF.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.61% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 2.82% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 3.66% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 4.90% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 4.29% | +0.94% |
Dividends
BNDS.AX vs. VAF.AX - Dividend Comparison
BNDS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than VAF.AX's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDS.AX BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF | 2.98% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 2.63% | 1.47% | 1.25% | 2.46% | 2.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAF.AX Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.29% | 0.96% | 0.41% | 2.41% | 3.24% | 2.49% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 3.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDS.AX and VAF.AX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for BNDS.AX and VAF.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer