BNDI vs. NLSI
BNDI (Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF) and NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDI is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Neos, while NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDI charges 0.58%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for NLSI.
Performance
BNDI vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDI achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than NLSI's 7.90% return.
BNDI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDI vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.97% | 0.43% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 7.90% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDI and NLSI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDI vs. NLSI — Risk / Return Rank
BNDI
NLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNDI vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDI | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDI vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDI drawdown since its inception was -7.25%, smaller than the maximum NLSI drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDI and NLSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDI | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -13.82% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.51% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -5.86% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
BNDI vs. NLSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDI | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 19.27% | -15.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 19.27% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 19.27% | -13.11% |
BNDI vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDI vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison
BNDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than NLSI's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 5.86% | 5.69% | 5.54% | 5.17% | 1.68% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.83% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDI and NLSI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
BNDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 2.83% for NLSI.
BNDI is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NLSI is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BNDI and 2.89% for NLSI.
Find the right allocation for BNDI and NLSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer