PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BND vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BND vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BND returned 1.53%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for REMX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BND charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

BND vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 18.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed REMX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.

BND

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.53%

REMX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-17.82%
YTD
18.26%
6M
21.26%
1Y
129.60%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		-0.07%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		18.26%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and REMX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between BND and REMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with BND:
BND vs. BNDXBND vs. FXNAXBND vs. AGGBND vs. FBNDBND vs. BNDWBND vs. TLTBND vs. VBTLX
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

Return for Risk

BND vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BNDREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.32
2.67

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.96
2.99

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

5.58

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

15.61

-10.18

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BND vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BNDREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.67

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.07

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.25

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-0.10

+0.68

Drawdowns

BND vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and REMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BNDREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-90.20%

+71.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-23.35%

+20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-62.11%

+56.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-73.34%

+55.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

-73.34%

+54.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-59.97%

+57.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-66.86%

+63.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

8.34%

-7.44%

Volatility

BND vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.20%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 14.39%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BNDREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

14.39%

-13.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

35.93%

-33.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

48.92%

-45.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

40.41%

-34.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

37.04%

-31.51%

BND vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BND vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than REMX's 1.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		3.98%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		1.49%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

BND and REMX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (14.39%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 9.04% vs 1.53% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.49% for REMX.

BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while REMX is Materials. BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer