PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND vs. JCPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND vs. JCPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than JCPI's 1.26% return.


BND

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.57%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
0.08%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.43%
ALL TIME*
3.03%

JCPI

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.18%
YTD
1.26%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. JCPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.08%7.08%1.38%5.65%-5.66%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.26%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and JCPI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.72

The correlation between BND and JCPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND vs. JCPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. JCPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDJCPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.17

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

6.25

-2.44

BND vs. JCPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the JCPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and JCPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BND vs. JCPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, which is greater than JCPI's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and JCPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDJCPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-7.85%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-1.60%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-2.77%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-0.82%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-1.84%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.55%

+0.44%

Volatility

BND vs. JCPI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDJCPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.35%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

3.07%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

4.48%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

4.48%

+1.05%

BND vs. JCPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BND vs. JCPI - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than JCPI's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.00%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
4.23%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND and JCPI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to JCPI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs JCPI's -7.85%.

On 3-year performance, JCPI leads with 5.17% vs 3.82% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JCPI has performed better with a 5.17% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

JCPI has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 4.00% for BND.

BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while JCPI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.25% for JCPI.

JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND and JCPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer