BND vs. AVUV
BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. BND is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BND returned 0.02%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for AVUV. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BND charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
BND vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.68% return.
BND
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
AVUV
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
BND vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.05% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 0.37% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.68% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND and AVUV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, BND and AVUV have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
BND
AVUV
BND vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BND | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 4.73 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 14.03 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BND | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.14 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.47 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BND vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -49.42% | +30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -7.95% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | -28.79% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -28.79% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -1.44% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -7.94% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 2.67% | -1.78% |
Volatility
BND vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.23%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 4.30% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 11.36% | -8.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 17.56% | -13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 22.74% | -16.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 28.29% | -22.76% |
BND vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BND vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than AVUV's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.30% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BND and AVUV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUV has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.66% vs 0.02% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.30% for AVUV.
BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BND and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer