BNB-USD vs. MSFT
BNB-USD (BNB) is a cryptocurrency, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BNB-USD returned 10.55%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNB-USD vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNB-USD achieves a -29.49% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -18.85% return.
BNB-USD
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -29.49%
- 6M
- -32.13%
- 1Y
- -7.11%
- 3Y*
- 36.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
BNB-USD vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNB-USD BNB | -29.49% | 23.21% | 124.36% | 26.83% | -51.86% | 1,277.47% | 170.06% | 126.63% | -29.71% | 320.60% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNB-USD and MSFT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNB-USD vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
BNB-USD
MSFT
BNB-USD vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNB (BNB-USD) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNB-USD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.89 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.53 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -1.08 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNB-USD vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNB-USD drawdown since its inception was -79.74%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNB-USD and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNB-USD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.74% | -69.38% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.24% | -33.91% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.24% | -33.91% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.89% | -37.15% | -32.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.42% | -27.46% | -25.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -21.78% | -16.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.27% | 16.48% | +25.79% |
Volatility
BNB-USD vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
BNB (BNB-USD) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.52%. This indicates that BNB-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNB-USD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 10.52% | +6.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.73% | 22.31% | +12.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.38% | 25.42% | +18.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.42% | 26.66% | +23.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.06% | 27.06% | +53.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNB-USD and MSFT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNB-USD has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNB-USD dropped -79.74% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
BNB-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNB-USD and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer