BN vs. RIO.L
BN (Brookfield Corporation) and RIO.L (Rio Tinto PLC) are both stocks. BN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while RIO.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BN returned 14.55%/yr vs 22.04%/yr for RIO.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BN vs. RIO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BN is traded in USD, while RIO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RIO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than RIO.L's 29.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BN has underperformed RIO.L with an annualized return of 14.55%, while RIO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.04% annualized return.
BN
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 6M
- -4.46%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 28.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
RIO.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 29.22%
- 6M
- 42.87%
- 1Y
- 81.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.04%
BN vs. RIO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | -3.44% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 29.22% | 44.94% | -14.82% | 12.61% | 17.90% | -0.65% | 34.36% | 33.42% | -5.37% | 43.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BN and RIO.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
BN:
$104.69B
RIO.L:
£124.62B
BN:
$0.56
RIO.L:
£13.15
BN:
78.31
RIO.L:
5.78
BN:
1.36
RIO.L:
1.12
BN:
2.44
RIO.L:
2.00
BN:
$76.58B
RIO.L:
£111.44B
BN:
$27.02B
RIO.L:
£45.93B
BN:
$31.07B
RIO.L:
£44.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN vs. RIO.L — Risk / Return Rank
BN
RIO.L
BN vs. RIO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN) and Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BN | RIO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.45 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 5.25 | -4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 19.91 | -18.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BN | RIO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.94 | -2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.72 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.21 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
BN vs. RIO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, smaller than the maximum RIO.L drawdown of -88.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and RIO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN | RIO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -88.71% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -15.38% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -23.98% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | -35.65% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.42% | -38.42% | -13.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -9.32% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.52% | -28.11% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 4.06% | +3.87% |
Volatility
BN vs. RIO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Corporation (BN) is 9.72%, while Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that BN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BN | RIO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 11.59% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.37% | 22.89% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.67% | 27.52% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.24% | 29.43% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 30.77% | -0.57% |
Dividends
BN vs. RIO.L - Dividend Comparison
BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than RIO.L's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 3.95% | 4.75% | 7.16% | 5.53% | 9.90% | 14.14% | 5.43% | 5.76% | 6.07% | 4.66% | 3.42% | 7.42% |
Financials
BN vs. RIO.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and Rio Tinto PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BN vs. RIO.L - Profitability Comparison
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
RIO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a gross profit of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
RIO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported an operating income of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
RIO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a net income of 5.46B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BN and RIO.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BN and RIO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer