BMVP vs. PEXL
BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BMVP returned 6.25%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for PEXL. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMVP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
BMVP vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 21.98% return.
BMVP
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 10.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
PEXL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 21.98%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 52.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
BMVP vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 6.62% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -13.89% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 21.98% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMVP and PEXL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BMVP and PEXL has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BMVP vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BMVP
PEXL
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
BMVP
PEXL
Financial Services
BMVP
PEXL
-
Technology
BMVP
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
BMVP
PEXL
Healthcare
BMVP
PEXL
Communication Services
BMVP
PEXL
Real Estate
BMVP
PEXL
-
Energy
BMVP
PEXL
Consumer Defensive
BMVP
PEXL
Utilities
BMVP
PEXL
-
Basic Materials
BMVP
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMVP vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
BMVP
PEXL
BMVP vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMVP | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 4.59 | -3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 19.74 | -14.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMVP | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.95 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.60 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.65 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
BMVP vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMVP | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -36.76% | -41.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -11.43% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -24.72% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -30.44% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -0.92% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -6.72% | -29.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.65% | -0.55% |
Volatility
BMVP vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 2.26%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMVP | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 5.31% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 13.14% | -5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.77% | 17.79% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 21.86% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 24.04% | -5.23% |
BMVP vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMVP vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than PEXL's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMVP and PEXL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to BMVP (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.04% vs 6.25% for BMVP. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.37% for PEXL.
BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMVP and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer