PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. ETHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMVP vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMVP vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
2.87%6.15%15.05%
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
2.47%10.23%8.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than ETHO's 2.47% return.


BMVP

1D
0.27%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.46%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
9.18%

ETHO

1D
1.26%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
2.47%
6M
5.50%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMVP vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHO
ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMVPETHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

1.01

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

1.55

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.62

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.73

6.81

-4.08

BMVP vs. ETHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the ETHO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and ETHO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMVPETHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.01

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.50

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and ETHO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMVP vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than ETHO's 0.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.73%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
0.84%0.86%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than ETHO's maximum drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and ETHO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPETHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-25.50%

-52.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-14.03%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-5.05%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-4.78%

-31.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.34%

-0.87%

Volatility

BMVP vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 3.09%, while Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMVPETHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

7.58%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

13.46%

-6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

22.46%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

19.61%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

19.61%

-0.77%