PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMVP vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BMVP having a 6.62% return and DIVO slightly higher at 6.64%.


BMVP

1D
0.73%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.60%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.43%

DIVO

1D
1.04%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.64%
6M
6.60%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
6.62%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.64%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and DIVO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.73

The correlation between BMVP and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BMVP vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BMVP
DIVO

Industrials

16.8%
16.2%

Financial Services

16.4%
30.3%

Technology

16.4%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
11.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
6.7%

Communication Services

7.6%
1.0%

Real Estate

5.5%

-

Energy

5.2%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.9%

Utilities

5.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.1%

Industrials

BMVP
16.8%
DIVO
16.2%

Financial Services

BMVP
16.4%
DIVO
30.3%

Technology

BMVP
16.4%
DIVO
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BMVP
10.6%
DIVO
11.6%

Healthcare

BMVP
9.7%
DIVO
6.7%

Communication Services

BMVP
7.6%
DIVO
1.0%

Real Estate

BMVP
5.5%
DIVO

-

Energy

BMVP
5.2%
DIVO
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

BMVP
5.1%
DIVO
6.9%

Utilities

BMVP
5.1%
DIVO
2.0%

Basic Materials

BMVP
1.6%
DIVO
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMVPDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.35

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

12.08

-7.30

BMVP vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMVPDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.21

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.91

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.86

-0.74

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-30.04%

-48.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-5.95%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-12.12%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-13.72%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

0.00%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-2.61%

-33.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.64%

+0.46%

Volatility

BMVP vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMVPDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

2.17%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

6.95%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

9.03%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

11.94%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

14.84%

+3.97%

BMVP vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMVP vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DIVO's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.67%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.35%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMVP and DIVO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMVP has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to DIVO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.84% vs 6.25% for BMVP. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.84% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 1.67% for BMVP.

BMVP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMVP and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer